State Taxes Are Wildly Regressive

Michael Stephens | February 3, 2012

Some indigestible food for thought:  there is not a single state in the Union—not one—in which the top 1% of income earners pay a higher rate of state taxes than the bottom 20%.  For the majority of states, it’s not even close:  the poorest 20% pay somewhere between double and six times the tax rate of the richest 1%.  In Florida, those who make the least pay 13.5% of their income in state taxes, while those who make the most pay 2.1%.

This comes to us from Mother Jones’ Kevin Drum, who dug into the comprehensive “Assets and Opportunity Scorecard” recently produced by the The Corporation for Enterprise Development.


3 Responses to “State Taxes Are Wildly Regressive”

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

  1. Comment by TylerFebruary 6, 2012 at 10:31 am   Reply

    This is all the more reason to abolish the FICA tax.

    • Comment by Michael StephensFebruary 7, 2012 at 12:09 pm   Reply

      Or perhaps another reason why federal aid to states is such a critical part of countercyclical policy in the US (or rather, should be). Presumably many states made up their crisis-induced budget shortfalls with tax increases as well as spending cuts—which means increases in some particularly regressive taxes.

  2. Comment by Dan Kervick — February 6, 2012 at 9:34 pm   Reply

    States also rely on lotteries and other gambling rackets to raise revenue, which are exploitative scams to trick the most needy people to into throwing their money away on desperate hopes of a big score.

Leave a Reply