Kijong Kim | May 14, 2010
The Bureau of Labor Statistics released its occupational employment and wages summary today.
With a surge of interest in economics in the general public, I wondered how many of us are hired to work (search Economists and Economics Teacher, Postsecondary). What is your guess? (Hint: for every 5,021 hired workers, one economist is at work)
$title = the_title('','',false); ?>
if ($title == 'Contributors') {
//get_levy_contributors();
} ?>
Comments
Thomas Masterson | May 13, 2010
Dean Baker debunks the myth that sluggish growth is caused by banks not lending money to small businesses. Long story short: it’s the recession! Businesses (especially small ones) are looking less like good credit risks because they have less revenue. What bank would be lending more in this atmosphere? A foolish bank.
$title = the_title('','',false); ?>
if ($title == 'Contributors') {
//get_levy_contributors();
} ?>
Comments
Dimitri Papadimitriou | May 10, 2010
The good news on U.S. employment is that we added 290,000 nonfarm jobs in April. The bad news is that unemployment rose as well, to 9.9%, because more people entered the labor force and many more returned to seeking work.
So unfortunately, the employment picture remains grim, with a level of unemployment we might have found horrifying just a couple of years ago. Many of us agree that the government has a role to play in creating more jobs, but nobody is paying much attention to the best kinds of jobs Washington should create.
As it turns out, they’re not the kinds of high-paying jobs most of us would want. But they are the kind that would help the most people—and get taxpayers the biggest bang for their buck.
How can the government accomplish these twin goals? My Levy Institute colleagues Rania Antonopoulos, Kijong Kim, Thomas Masterson, and Ajit Zacharias studied this question and came up with a surprising answer. The best jobs for Washington to create don’t involve repairing bridges and digging subway tunnels, worthy as those initiatives may be. Nor do they involve wind power or other green technologies, although those too are fine undertakings.
No, the best jobs government could possibly create are what we’ll call “social sector” jobs—roughly speaking, work taking care of people. We’re talking about home health-care aides, child-care workers—relatively low-skill, low-wage work that nonetheless is fantastically cost-effective, hugely important, and a highly equitable use of government funds. continue reading…
$title = the_title('','',false); ?>
if ($title == 'Contributors') {
//get_levy_contributors();
} ?>
Comments
Thomas Masterson | May 7, 2010
The Bureau of Labor Statistics released its monthly Employment Situation Report this morning. The headlines will announce an increase of 290,000 in nonfarm payroll employment and a jump in the unemployment rate to 9.9%. While employment grew, the labor force grew faster than usual, with 195,000 lured back into looking for work by better prospects in the job market. Even without these re-entrants, the labor force grew by 610,000 in April. So while trends are pointing in the right direction, the unemployment rate will continue to look bleak for quite awhile. continue reading…
$title = the_title('','',false); ?>
if ($title == 'Contributors') {
//get_levy_contributors();
} ?>
Comments