Going Big

Michael Stephens | September 8, 2011

Leading up to today’s jobs speech the internal debates in the administration (or so the leaks tell us) have been over whether to propose something minimal that might have a chance of passing, or something bold, knowing that nothing has a chance of getting through Congress anyway.

Randall Wray and Stephanie Kelton demonstrate what it would look like to “go big”:

The government could serve as the “employer of last resort” under a job guarantee program modeled on the WPA (the Works Progress Administration, in existence from 1935 to 1943 after being renamed the Work Projects Administration in 1939) and the CCC (Civilian Conservation Corps, 1933-1942). The program would offer a job to any American who was ready and willing to work at the federal minimum wage, plus legislated benefits. No time limits. No means testing. No minimum education or skill requirements.

The program would operate like a buffer stock, absorbing and releasing workers during the economy’s natural boom-and-bust cycles. In a boom, employers would recruit workers out of the program; in a slump the safety net would allow those who had lost their jobs to continue to work to preserve good habits, making them easier to re-employ when activity picked up. The program would also take those whose education, training or job experience was initially inadequate to obtain work outside the program, enhancing their employability through on-the-job training. Work records would be maintained for all program participants and would be available for potential employers. Unemployment offices could be converted to employment offices, to match workers with jobs in the program, and to help private and public employers recruit workers.

Read the rest here.

Comments


2 Responses to “Going Big”

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

  1. Comment by rjsSeptember 8, 2011 at 5:07 pm   Reply

    i can hear them ranting “socialism” already…

    • Comment by Michael StephensSeptember 8, 2011 at 7:43 pm   Reply

      Likely. Though if they’re going to insist on crying “socialism!” at the sight of a Romney/Heritage-inspired health care plan, they might as well be given the chance to rant at something that’s genuinely on the progressive edge of the American policy landscape.

Leave a Reply